
Pico 4 vs Meta Quest 3 – Check Which One Is Best & Why?
Meta Quest 3 & Pico 4 share many similarities, but there are also important differences, such as quality, performance, features, design, and connectivity. If you want the best one between them, I Would recommend the Meta Quest 3 rather than the Pico 4.
Why Do I Recommend The Meta Quest 3?
- The Meta Quest 3 features a powerful Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2 processor for enhanced performance, improved graphics rendering, and faster load times to deliver a smoother and more immersive VR experience compared to the Pico 4’s XR2 Gen 1.
- Meta Quest 3’s Touch Plus Controllers offer improved haptic feedback, better precision, and a more ergonomic design, enhancing gameplay accuracy and interaction quality compared to the Pico 4’s standard controllers.
- It has a Quantum Dot LCD display that delivers richer colors, deeper contrast, and improved visual vibrancy, providing a more immersive viewing experience compared to the Pico 4’s standard LCD panel.
- The Meta Quest 3’s Full-color Passthrough with Advanced Depth Mapping enhances mixed reality (MR) features with superior spatial awareness and accurate environmental mapping compared to the Pico 4’s MR capabilities.
- Meta Quest 3’s Wi-Fi 6E connectivity ensures faster data transfer speeds and lower latency for delivering a more stable wireless PC VR experience compared to the Pico 4’s Wi-Fi 6 support.
- Its Extensive Game Library includes a broader range of exclusive titles and popular VR content for richer gaming experiences and unique Meta platform integrations, which are not available on the Pico 4.
- The Meta Quest 3’s Enhanced Spatial Audio system offers improved bass response, clearer sound directionality, and a more immersive audio experience, compared to the Pico 4’s standard spatial audio setup.
- Meta Quest 3’s Oculus Link and Air Link provide seamless wireless PC VR support with superior stability, reduced latency, and better visual fidelity than the Pico 4’s Pico Link solution.
- Meta Quest 3 has a wider field of view (110degrees) that improves the peripheral vision in virtual reality & feel more engrossed in virtual surroundings compared to Pico 4’s 105 degrees.
Maybe the Pico 4 price can make you comfortable because it’s a little bit cheaper than the Meta Quest 3. But you have to compromise all the above-mentioned features. Now the Decision is Yours. I hope it was helpful to choose the right one.
.
Side By Side Comparison
Feature | Meta Quest 3 | Pico 4 |
Resolution | 2064 x 2208 pixels per eye | 2160 x 2160 pixels per eye |
Field of View (FOV) | 110° | 105° |
Refresh Rate | 90Hz / 120Hz | 72Hz / 90Hz |
RAM | 8GB LPDDR5 | 8GB LPDDR4X |
Storage Options | 128GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB |
Battery Life | ~2.5 – 3 hours | ~3 hours |
Controller Tracking | Inside-out tracking with improved precision | Standard inside-out tracking |
Controller Design | Touch Plus Controllers with improved haptics | Pico 4 Controllers with standard haptics |
Hand Tracking | Advanced hand tracking with improved accuracy | Basic hand tracking |
Facial Tracking | Supported | Not Supported |
Audio System | Enhanced spatial audio with better bass response | Standard spatial audio |
Wi-Fi Connectivity | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
PC VR Support | Oculus Link / Air Link | Pico Link |
Weight | ~515g | ~295g |
Head Strap Design | Redesigned for balanced weight distribution | Slimmer design with battery at the back |
Software Ecosystem | Meta platform with extensive social features | Pico platform with limited social features |
Exclusive Games | Extensive library with popular exclusives | Limited exclusives |
Price | Check Meta Quest 3 Price | Check Pico 4 Price |
What Common Both Can Do?
- Standalone VR Experience: Both the Meta Quest 3 and Pico 4 are fully standalone VR headsets, eliminating the need for an external PC or console for standard VR experiences.
- Display Technology: Each headset features an LCD display with high pixel density, ensuring sharp visuals and detailed imagery during gameplay.
- Full-Color Passthrough: Both devices support full-color passthrough, allowing users to view their surroundings directly from the headset. This is crucial for augmented reality (AR) experiences and maintaining spatial awareness.
- Inside-out Tracking: Both models incorporate inside-out tracking using four external cameras, ensuring accurate positional tracking without the need for external sensors.
- Wireless PC VR Support: Each headset offers seamless wireless PC VR connectivity via Air Link (Quest 3) or Pico Link (Pico 4), allowing users to enjoy high-end PC VR games.
- Battery Life: Both headsets deliver similar battery performance, offering approximately 2.5 – 3 hours of continuous use.
- USB-C Charging: Both devices support USB-C fast charging for quicker recharge times.
- Hand Tracking: Each model includes hand tracking technology for controller-free interactions, enhancing immersion in compatible apps and games.
- Adjustable IPD (Interpupillary Distance): Both headsets offer manual IPD adjustment to ensure optimal visual clarity based on the user’s eye spacing.
- 3D Spatial Audio: Both deliver immersive spatial audio, enhancing depth and directionality in sound for improved VR experiences.
- Comfort-Focused Design: While their designs differ, both headsets prioritize comfort with well-balanced weight distribution for extended gaming sessions.
- Fitness Support: Each platform supports a range of fitness and workout applications, catering to users looking to incorporate VR into their exercise routines.
- VR Content Libraries: While Meta Quest 3 has a stronger library, both platforms provide diverse and expanding VR content options.
- Streaming Support: Both devices enable access to popular streaming platforms like Netflix, YouTube, and more for media consumption in VR.
- Voice Commands: Both headsets integrate voice control features for easier navigation and command execution within the platform interface.
Common Features
Feature | Meta Quest 3 | Pico 4 |
Standalone VR Headset | Yes | Yes |
Display Type | LCD | LCD |
Passthrough Technology | Full-color Passthrough | Full-color Passthrough |
Resolution Quality | High-resolution visuals | High-resolution visuals |
Inside-out Tracking | Yes | Yes |
Wireless PC VR Support | Yes | Yes |
Battery Life | ~2.5 – 3 hours | ~3 hours |
USB-C Charging | Yes | Yes |
Hand Tracking | Yes | Yes |
Adjustable IPD | Yes | Yes |
Storage Options | 128GB / Higher-tier option | 128GB / Higher-tier option |
Wi-Fi Connectivity | Yes | Yes |
3D Spatial Audio | Yes | Yes |
Comfort-focused Design | Yes | Yes |
Fitness & Workout Support | Yes | Yes |
VR Content Libraries | Yes | Yes |
Multiplayer Capabilities | Yes | Yes |
App Store for VR Games | Yes | Yes |
Streaming Support | Yes | Yes |
Voice Commands | Yes | Yes |
Price | Check Meta Quest 3 Price | Check Pico 4 Price |
FAQ
Does the Meta Quest 3 or Pico 4 offer better display quality? Which headset offers better performance for gaming? Is hand tracking available on both devices? Can both headsets connect to a PC for VR gaming? Which headset is more comfortable to wear for extended periods? Does the Meta Quest 3 or Pico 4 have better controllers? Which headset is better for mixed reality (MR) experiences? Are both devices compatible with fitness apps? What are the storage options available for each device? Which headset is better for social features and multiplayer gaming? Can I watch Netflix, YouTube, or other streaming platforms on these headsets? Which headset offers better audio quality? Are both devices suitable for beginners in VR? |